Marijuana Record Keeping Plan – Track Down More Details..

California recreational marijuana dispensaries are collecting customers’ private information – including government identification documents along with what products they buy – however the record keeping is not part of Proposition 64, their state law voters approved in November 2016.

Variety of the data raises concerns for a few since it remains unclear how the federal government intends to respond to marijuana record keeping plan, considering that the herb remains a controlled substance in U.S. statutes.

In comparison, Colorado and Oregon, states which also have legalized recreational use, banned assortment of personal information. And officials in Washington, another state with legal weed, said building customer databases will not be practiced there.

Along with concerns about privacy and identity theft, the info collection even offers caught the interest of Second Amendment proponents, because marijuana use by firearm owners is prohibited under federal law.

A check of vendors nearest Fresno County (which has no recreational marijuana outlets) found none when a customer profile had not been continued dispensary computers. That also includes an outlet in Woodlake in Tulare County along with dispensaries in Stanislaus County, Salinas, Santa Cruz, Sacramento and also the Bay Area.

When asked why customer profiles were created, several dispensary workers incorrectly stated the details was required under Proposition 64. Others cited it as a customer convenience. All said a consumer who failed to consent to the terms would be turned away. None of those queried would agree to supply a surname to your Fresno Bee reporter.

Valley Pure, the initial legal recreational marijuana store in the region, has opened in Woodlake in Tulare County.

Valley Pure

In Woodlake, a man who identified himself because the manager of Valley Pure, the first recreational dispensary in Tulare County, cited state regulations for the data collection. He would not identify himself and said inquiries vftzig the information collection constituted “harrassment.”

Jason Finfrock, the reported owner of Valley Pure, said Thursday he would have no comment on the issue. At the Green Door in San Francisco, a worker said, “We will only ring you up should you come up on our profile.”

At Canna Cruz in Santa Cruz, a man who gave his first name as Ian said the details was essental to law and added, “if a person didn’t wish to accomplish that, we might suggest they not shop at our dispensary.” Similar responses originated from workers at Flavors, inside the Stanislaus County town of Riverbank, at People’s Remedy in Modesto and Alpine Alternatives in Sacramento.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.